The US architecture industry faces a growing challenge: demand for skilled professionals continues to rise while the actual costs of employing architects strain firm budgets. What does an architect really cost? And are there intelligent alternatives that maintain quality while dramatically improving profitability?
The Hidden Costs: What an Architect Actually Costs Your Firm
When discussing salaries, most people think of the gross salary. But the reality for employers is starkly different. An average architect earning $107,465 annually actually costs their employer approximately $134,331 per year – that’s about $11,194 monthly.
This 25% markup includes:
- Payroll taxes (Social Security, Medicare, unemployment)
- Health insurance and benefits
- Retirement contributions (401k matching)
- Paid time off
- Professional development and licensing
- Office overhead and equipment
For senior architects or those in high-cost markets like New York or California, total employer costs can easily exceed $250,000 annually. Even entry-level architects cost firms $83,000-$87,000 per year when all expenses are considered.
The Talent Shortage Intensifies the Problem
These high costs collide with a tight labor market. Qualified architects are scarce, and competition for top talent drives salaries even higher. Small to mid-sized firms often can’t compete with the compensation packages offered by large corporations or tech companies entering the design space.
The result: Many firms must turn down projects or struggle to scale at the pace the market demands. Projects face delays, innovation stalls, and growth opportunities slip away.


A Strategic Solution: Leveraging Global Talent
Forward-thinking architecture firms are discovering a powerful alternative to the traditional hiring model. Instead of limiting themselves to the local talent pool, they’re accessing highly qualified international professionals – without sacrificing quality.
The Advantages at a Glance:
- Dramatic Cost Savings
Starting at just $1,750 per month, firms can save up to 80% on personnel costs. This means for the cost of one local architect, you could employ a team of four to five highly qualified international professionals. - Access to Top-Tier
Talent Countries like Colombia produce exceptional architects and engineers who:- Hold degrees from prestigious universities
- Are highly motivated to work on international projects
- Have experience with international standards and practices
- Speak fluent English (and often eager to learn additional languages)
- Flexibility Without Risk
Unlike traditional employment, you can scale your team up or down based on project needs. No lengthy termination processes, no concerns about utilization during slower periods. - Focus on Core
Competencies Delegate routine drafting and technical tasks while your local team concentrates on client relationships, creative design, and strategic initiatives.

Quality Through Process
Success in global talent integration relies on structured systems:
- Rigorous screening ensures only the top 3% of applicants join teams
- Intensive training on US building codes, ADA requirements, and local standards
- Continuous education keeps skills current with industry developments
- Regular team integration through video conferences and collaborative platforms
Real-World Transformation
Consider the experience of notfaroff’s founders, who initially doubted the outsourcing model. Running their own engineering firm in 2020, they were skeptical about remote talent. Working with a Colombian intern changed everything: this individual became a key team member, proactively learned new skills, and eventually took on leadership responsibilities – all while working remotely from Colombia. Today, nearly all their firm’s operational work is handled by international teams.


The Path Forward
The architecture industry faces mounting pressures: digital transformation, BIM adoption, sustainability requirements, and increasing cost competition. Firms that can operate flexibly and cost-effectively will emerge as winners.
Smart outsourcing isn’t a stopgap measure – it’s a strategic decision for:
- Competitive advantage through significantly lower cost structures
- Scalability without financial risk
- Access to specialized skills (BIM, computational design, visualization)
- International perspectives and fresh design approaches
Do the Math
A full-time architect costs your firm at least $134,000 per year. For that same budget, you could build a flexible team of specialists that multiplies your capacity. The question isn’t whether you can afford to outsource – it’s whether you can afford not to.
Consider this comparison:
One local architect: $134,000/year
Alternative model: 4 international team members ($134,000) = Same cost, 4x the capacity

The Future is Here
Architecture firms using this model report:
- 70% faster project delivery
- 50% improvement in profit margins
- Ability to take on 3x more projects
- Higher client satisfaction through faster turnarounds
The future of architecture is global, flexible, and efficient. Firms embracing this reality aren’t just surviving – they’re thriving.
Ready to discover how global talent can transform your architecture practice?
Contact us for a no-obligation consultation and learn how other firms are already leveraging this model to accelerate their growth.